[75684] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Diffserv service classes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vicky)
Sat Nov 20 17:13:10 2004
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:12:22 -0800
From: Vicky <vickyr@socal.rr.com>
Reply-To: vickyr@socal.rr.com
To: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, nsp-qos@puck.nether.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0411182249140.11527@clifden.donelan.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
ietfreport is timing out....here's another url for this draft.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-diffserv-basic-classes-04.txt
interesting read at:
http://qbone.internet2.edu/papers/non-architectural-problems.txt
regards,
/vicky
Sean Donelan wrote:
| In the continuing effort to make Diffserv useful on the Internet,
| the Transport Area working group has the draft:
|
| http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-baker-diffserv-basic-classes/
|
| The draft has a little bit for everyone. Lots of rope/flexibility for
| application developers. But have any network operators thought how they
| could actually support the framework in any meaningful way? And assuming
| the network actually supported it, what happens when you throw such fine
| grain differentiated traffic at the network?
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBn8EfpbZvCIJx1bcRAn4mAKCAjZu5k89IVIDXajJW9tp2MmO4+QCgrFmM
ojED2CtlqNO92BqCcnWcG6Y=
=5lJL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
