[75674] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Sat Nov 20 07:14:48 2004
In-Reply-To: <BDC39C7D.B38A%christian.kuhtz@bellsouth.com>
Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:14:19 +0100
To: "Christian Kuhtz" <christian.kuhtz@BELLSOUTH.COM>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 19-nov-04, at 18:50, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
> why would the enterprise care to switch to IPv6 in the first place?
Because it's easier to build a big IPv6 network than to build a big
IPv4 network. I think over the next few years we'll see people building
IPv6 networks and then tunneling IPv4 over them as it's easier to have
the infrastructure parts run IPv6, especially (but not exclusively) if
IPv4 address space is less than abundant.
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary,
> and/or privileged
Yes; I don't care. I'm assuming it is not possible to leave this out,
but could you please have some kind of separator between your actual
message and the lawyerese so it's easier to ignore the latter?
