[75670] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Goofle/Sprint having problems?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian W. Gemberling)
Fri Nov 19 18:37:49 2004
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:37:09 -0500 (EST)
From: "Brian W. Gemberling" <bwgember@ptptech.com>
To: Vandy Hamidi <vandy.hamidi@markettools.com>
Cc: Paul G <paul@rusko.us>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <8D40D9A9A9287340BBED080F91B31035099227@mvmail05.markettools.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
France Telecom...
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Vandy Hamidi wrote:
>
> Problem is fixed.
> Looks like a quick patch was put into place.
> Who is opentransit.net?
>
>
> 3 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms sl-gw27-stk-4-4-TS5.sprintlink.net
> [144.228.107.
> 4 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms sl-bb21-stk-9-0.sprintlink.net
> [144.232.4.245]
> 5 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms sl-bb24-sj-9-0.sprintlink.net
> [144.232.20.181]
> 6 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms sl-st21-pa-15-1.sprintlink.net
> [144.232.20.40]
> 7 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms sl-franc2-6-0.sprintlink.net
> [144.223.243.82]
> 8 9 ms 9 ms 14 ms Google-EU-Customers.GW.opentransit.net
> [193.251.
> 9 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms 216.239.48.174
> 10 11 ms 10 ms 11 ms 216.239.48.214
> 11 19 ms 16 ms 11 ms 216.239.48.210
> 12 11 ms 10 ms 10 ms 216.239.49.168
> 13 11 ms 12 ms 11 ms 216.239.49.2
> 14 10 ms 19 ms 16 ms 216.239.57.99
>
> Trace complete.
>
> H:\>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
> Paul G
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:43 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Goofle/Sprint having problems?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sean Donelan" <sean@donelan.com>
> To: <nanog@merit.edu>
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:38 PM
> Subject: RE: Goofle/Sprint having problems?
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Vandy Hamidi wrote:
>>> Yeah, a visual route just showed my trace going to AUS and then
>>> Singapore.
>>>
>>> Hmm... You think Google is going to be pissed when they find out
> their
>>> site was being routed to Asia?
>>>
>>> Heads will roll... (lawsuit?)
>>
>>
>> NANOG recuring topic thread #4
>>
>> Gee, maybe there should be a registry of authorized routes and who
> they
>> belong too that ISPs could check. We could even call it the Internet
>> Routing Registry.
>
> ... and we could then make fun of those few (sic/sar) that don't filter
> based on that data on a mailing list we could call nanog-l.
>
> paul
>
> ---
> paul galynin
>
>
>
