[75651] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [nanog] RE: Stupid Ipv6 question...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Mahoney, System Admin)
Fri Nov 19 14:14:47 2004
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:12:07 -0500 (EST)
From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org>
To: Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com>
Cc: "'Kevin Loch'" <kloch@hotnic.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19042694127063@schlep.emanon.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Scott Morris wrote:
No, nobody ever reads that tag. It says "not to be removed except by the
consumer".
Which with at least one severly drunk friend of mine, has meant that if
you remove it, you have to eat it :)
-Dan
>
> Does that mean if we rip them off that we may be prosecuted?
>
> ;)
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
> Kevin Loch
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:41 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Stupid Ipv6 question...
>
>
> Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
>> With the exception of auto-configuration, I have yet to see any
>> IPv6 gear that cares about prefix length. Configuring a /1 to a
>> /128 seems to work just fine. If anyone knows of gear imposing
>> narrower limits on what can be configured I'd be facinated to know
>> about them.
>>
>
> 64 bit prefixes are the mattress tags of IPv6 interfaces.
>
> --
> Kevin Loch
>
>
--
"We need another cat. This one's retarded."
-Cali, March 8, 2003 (3:43 AM)
--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------
