[75648] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Loch)
Fri Nov 19 14:04:57 2004
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:50:49 -0500
From: "Kevin Loch" <kloch@gurunet.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <068c01c4cdf2$58bfc8c0$6801a8c0@stephen>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> According to multi6, you will get PA space from each of your ISPs and
> overlay a prefix from each on every subnet. I'll save y'all another
> rant on the workability of that model...
FWIW, I have submitted an I-D for a method that does not require overlay
prefixes, extra routing table entries or globally unique AS's:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-loch-multi6-alternate-path-encoding-01.txt
Note: bit order notation is apparently reversed from I-D standards and
will be fixed in the -02 version.
Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated (off-list).
--
Kevin Loch
