[75636] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Nov 19 12:39:36 2004
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:40:53 -0800
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>,
Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5A88C1D8-3A1C-11D9-992B-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==========AC5A74C9D397FC1DA783==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
> Now I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but having unaggregatable
> globally routable address space just doesn't scale and there are no
> routing tricks that can make it scale, whatever you put in the IP version
> bits, so learn to love renumbering.
>
This is patently false. If it were true, then I would have to renumber
every time I changed telephone companies. I don't, so, obviously, there
is some solution to this problem. Now I'm not saying that I necessarily
want to accept the overhead and risks of SS7 to solve this, but, there
are, obviously, routing tricks that can be used.
Owen
--=20
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
--==========AC5A74C9D397FC1DA783==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBnjAln5zKWQ/iqj0RAqLnAKCHFUD9FoaYYkLXTUAXvLvxf+XIuwCfVIlV
9xq2JPUI/v2eTQpjzVymKnQ=
=GVGV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========AC5A74C9D397FC1DA783==========--
