[75572] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cable and Wireless partners with Reliance to set up datacenters
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Mahoney, System Admin)
Tue Nov 16 22:45:04 2004
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:45:58 -0500 (EST)
From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org>
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh@outblaze.com>
Cc: NANOG <NANOG@merit.edu>, sanog@sanog.org
In-Reply-To: <419AC738.2010702@outblaze.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Doesn't this in theory mean any isp who hands you any pipe that you can
slap a linksys VPN router on is also liable? Where does it begin? When
it's the ISP who provides the router? What about colo? Isn't a dedicated
box (with KAME/Ipsec/OpenVPN/etc) enough to do that?
What about companies who provide ipv6 connectivity over ipv4?
Or is this going to get to the point where there's going to be a
requirement for protocol detection and ISPs will have to perform due
diligence and scan/block -- or pony up?
-Dan
>
> http://cwidc.com/JP/EN/news_events/media_center/2004/02_04_2004_16.html
>
> Says they're offering managed IP-VPN QoS besides other stuff like data center
> hosting, ATM, frame relay etc.. I'm sure they're going to be really happy
> with the proposed "tax" on managed VPN providers in India.
>
> srs
>
>
--
"Hey Guys, does anyone know what 'poon tang' is?"
-C.S. Dave, July 8, 2K, about 12:30AM
--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------
