[75532] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Nov 15 12:03:50 2004
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: Hank Nussbacher <hank@mail.iucc.ac.il>,
NANOG list <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:10:03 +0100."
<0692504E-3660-11D9-9D6A-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:03:06 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1742283221P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:10:03 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum said:
> only leaf sites use the 32 bit AS numbers. 32 bit AS numbers for
> transit ASes are best avoided until everyone has upgraded.
Umm... I'll bite.. ;)
How do we know/tell that "everyone" has upgraded? (As opposed to just
saying "It's been N+4 years now, everybody must have upgraded by *now*"?)
Of course, we *could* always declare "everybody" as "98% of the sites that
have good contact info in the various Whois databases are ready to go,
the rest know about the issue, and those with bum contact info will get
what they deserve when we deploy" :)
--==_Exmh_1742283221P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFBmOFJcC3lWbTT17ARAr7PAJ4si4ORzxdn7Z6z+ZqKrfxWZoz/rgCbBwXu
TN1Pouzn9jCNuv8Xvqz41dU=
=44q/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1742283221P--
