[75362] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Thu Nov 11 23:04:37 2004
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
Date: 12 Nov 2004 04:03:46 +0000
In-Reply-To: <E0BA4C8D-3438-11D9-9D6A-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
iljitsch@muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) writes:
> Wow, IPv6 misinformation is reaching unprecendented heights here on
> NANOG...
yes. for example, you wrote...
> There is currently no PI in IPv6 unless you're an internet exchange or
> a root server.
...but i really do think of 2001:4f8::/32 as PI, even though ISC is neither
an IX nor a rootserver. (f-root has its own /48, which is something else.)
--
Paul Vixie
