[75318] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Rosowski)
Thu Nov 11 11:44:17 2004
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:43:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Rosowski <rosowskij@ie.ymp.gov>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Nilsson?= <mansaxel@sunet.se>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <E9CB70E60FA6A71809356119@E3993D2B0BE66833664712A4>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> My AFS, Kerberos, and active FTP sessions think that you are being very,
> very optimistic about the usability of non-unique adresses and kludgy
> middleboxen who think they understand networking.
Don't forget IPSec, and Cisco skinny IP telephone protocol, and of course
more importantly, my half-life game server. I'd have to agree, NAT is a
kludgy fix at best.
