[75282] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Wed Nov 10 09:56:50 2004
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:55:26 -0800
To: Michael.Dillon@radianz.com
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> If IPv6 had "local scope" addresses, then NAT would not be
> necessary to prevent traffic from flowing through the
> unauthorized link.
yes. just like we see no 1918 leakage now.
randy
