[75280] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael.Dillon@radianz.com)
Wed Nov 10 09:46:38 2004
In-Reply-To: <16785.10317.975655.877660@ran.psg.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Michael.Dillon@radianz.com
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:46:44 +0000
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> and do explain how a user coming in with their laptop and
> dialing a provider is gonna be affected by your nat
If IPv6 had "local scope" addresses, then NAT would not be
necessary to prevent traffic from flowing through the
unauthorized link. I know that the IETF has deprecated
local scope addresses but I'm curious whether any of the
router vendors currently support local scope addresses
in their equipment.
--Michael Dillon
