[75265] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Tue Nov 9 18:00:46 2004

Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:00:04 -0500
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3DB823D2-32A1-11D9-A560-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message written on Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:46:49PM +0100, Iljitsch van=
 Beijnum wrote:
> However, there is plenty of address space in IPv6 to go NATless, so=20
> protocol desingers and implementers are unlikey to add NAT workarounds=20
> for IPv6. This means it's very unlikely that applications that don't=20
> use simple client/server communication are going to work with NAT in=20
> IPv6.

As long as IPv4 exists, which I predict will be a long time, the
"protocol designers" which are really application developers for
your purposes, will write to the lowest common denominator.  API's
for all the major platforms already look like this; you open a TCP
socket to an end address, be it IPv4 or IPv6 in a dual stack machine.

So with the protocols still designed to work over IPv4 NAT, and the
complexity of IPv6 NAT being roughly "s/long/long long/g" (yes,
simplified, but you get my point) and recompiling your NAT code,
I'm not sure what will be the barrier to IPv6 NAT.

I would love to see a solid technical reason why IPv6 NAT will NOT work.
In the absense of that I will stick to my guns and say that it will
work and be available, and most likely sooner rather than later.

--=20
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBkUvzNh6mMG5yMTYRAvXzAJwKNkQiUM9RU5dJyioqSLkw1l7ZJACfTAyX
uKcKVnnQsklCekgSw7r/RjE=
=LxgL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post