[75208] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Tue Nov 9 03:18:08 2004
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:09:09 +0200
To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>, nanog@merit.edu
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@mail.iucc.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: <20041108192500.GA90026@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 02:25 PM 08-11-04 -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>More to the point, it seems to me the working group is highly
>enterprise focused, and seems to want to give enterprises what
>they (think) they want with little concern for how it impacts the
>global Internet.
I think you need to look at one of the authors - Nokia. Perhaps
2001:490::/32 and 3FFE:8130::/28 are not enough for what they have in
mind. Perhaps someone from RIPE should sit down with Nokia (and perhaps
all the other cell makers) and find out what they truly want and why these
IETF drafts solve their problem. Perhaps just giving them what they want
(and think they will need) will make this all go away?
-Hank
>Since this is a list of providers, I encourage you to read the
>drafts, and submit your comments to the working group. The information
>for the working group is at
>http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ipv6-charter.html, and includes
>their mailing list archives and information on how to subscribe
>and/or post.
>
>Even if you disagree with me, much like voting the important thing is
>that you voice your opinion.
>
>--=20
> Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
>Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
>
>
>*** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
