[75167] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Mon Nov 8 16:05:04 2004
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:04:28 -0800
To: Eric Gauthier <eric@roxanne.org>
Cc: nanog@Merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> I must admint, I'm really not up on the more subtle aspects of v6
> addressing nor have I read the drafts you posted, but I've never
> understood why we needed a new set of RFC1918-like IPv6 space.
because there is not enough v6 address space?
because we like nats?
because we think we can't get space?
randy
