[74649] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [nanog] Re: short Botnet list and Cashing in on DoS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexei Roudnev)
Sun Oct 10 03:04:21 2004
From: "Alexei Roudnev" <alex@relcom.net>
To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org>
Cc: "Gadi Evron" <ge@linuxbox.org>,
"Petri Helenius" <pete@he.iki.fi>, "Paul Vixie" <vixie@vix.com>,
<nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 00:02:35 -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
>
> Then get yourself a personal colo (http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/) A
> dynamic ip is no place for a server of any kind.
It is wrong - dynamic IP is just a dynamic IP. Nothing more.
if you are doing any filtering, do not name it IP; nname it _home network
with elements of IP_, for example.
>
> And it IS the isp's concern. Most of them would consider running a mail
> server on a home-user grade cable connection to be in violation of their
> AUP if push came to shove, and they have every right to block you.
Incorrect - they do not have any such AUP in place. It is your fantasy.
>
> -Dan
>
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>> Next you'll block SIP if we start getting "spam calls"? Or any other
> >>> application that pops up and is used by the same people sending spam
> > today?
> >>
> >> There is the issue of usability. Why does a Cable user on a dynamic
> >> range need SMTP open?
> > Because I am running my own SMTP server @ FreeBSD, for example. It is MY
> > concern, not ISP concern.
> >
> > .
> >
>
> --
>
> "She's been getting attacked by these leeches, they're leaving these marks
> all over her neck. You gotta keep her out of those woods. If one more
> leech gets her, she's gonna get a smack."
>
> -Someone's Mother, December 18th, 1998
>
> --------Dan Mahoney--------
> Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
> Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
> ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
> Site: http://www.gushi.org
> ---------------------------
>
