[74618] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [OT] Good Anti-Spam Boilerplate
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Charles Sprickman)
Fri Oct 8 17:29:34 2004
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:28:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20041008152845.H81938@shell.inch.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> After some senseless Googling, I'm at a loss. I'm looking for a very
> comprehensive, up-to-date example of an AUP that covers spam. When I say
> "modern", I mean that I want it to include not just direct spamming, but
> abuse of remote open-relays, abuse of remote trojaned boxes, sending
> through a third party that circumvents the local AUP, etc. Some good
> definition of "requested email" would be great - ie: double opt-in, or
> single opt-in with some documentation that the user requested the mail on
> a web form or similar.
>
> Some language that covers penalties would also be helpful, such as
> equipment seizure for non-payment of penalties.
>
> Please reply privately and I'll summarize. I do not wish to get into any
> debates about what qualifies as spam on this list.
Replying to myself here...
Thanks to everyone. I'd missed the spamhaus "spam definition" which will
be very helpful in wording a few things. And the prize for "best TOS"
goes to Steve Sobol from "justthe.net". This one is great:
http://justthe.net/legal/tos/
I especially like the pdf generator. :)
Now I'll have to see what the lawyer thinks.
Thanks again everyone,
Charles
> Thanks,
>
> Charles
>
> --
> Charles Sprickman
> spork@inch.com
>
