[74383] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Abley)
Thu Sep 23 17:57:28 2004
In-Reply-To: <5e185ac10409231320272f102d@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:56:42 -0400
To: Matt Ghali <mghali@gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 23 Sep 2004, at 16:20, Matt Ghali wrote:
> Does anyone else find this as offensive as I do?
I guess the answer is yes, but I'm interested to know why.
The proposal (which comes from APNIC members, not from APNIC staff)
concerns non-portable addresses assigned to end-users. I don't know
about anybody else, but I've never had any luck getting a response from
people in that category anyway; it's invariably the upstream ISPs who
respond (if anybody does), and there is no suggestion that their
contact details will be able to be hidden.
So what difference will it make?
Joe
