[74224] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Edward B. Dreger)
Sat Sep 18 10:35:28 2004

Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:34:26 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Edward B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <013f01c49c3e$c54b0530$0200020a@jamesnew>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


je> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:44:48 -0600
je> From: james edwards

je> FWIW, I asked about MLFR on the cisco-nsp and one person
je> responded indicating he worked for some time with Cisco on
je> trying to get MLFR to work but never resolved out of order
je> and dropped packet issues. What hardware are you considering

I must have missed your post, or I'd have chimed in.  I've noted
MFR flakiness (dropped packets, sudden interface down, additional
links become unbonded and refuse to bond again, MTU troubles with
MPLS, wedged processes, etc.) on 12.3 and 12.3T.

Bryce, you might also consider an M13 mux if worried about loop
reliability.  However, at this point, I'd place my bets on a DS3
loop as opposed to several MFR-ified T1s. :-/


Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
_________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc@brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq@intc.net -*- sam@everquick.net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post