[74129] in North American Network Operators' Group
Anyone use Riverbed Steelhead?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kristin Gorman)
Tue Sep 14 22:22:34 2004
From: "Kristin Gorman" <kmgorman@nyc.rr.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:22:07 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C49AA9.45296DB0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has worked with the Riverbed Steelhead
appliance. So far, we have seen amazing results in our lab (~5-10 Mbps
throughput over a 768K link), but It would be nice to hear some real
world experiences. I'm also wondering if there is flaky behavior once
it's deployed.
Thanks,
Kristin
------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C49AA9.45296DB0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.0.4630.0">
<TITLE>Anyone use Riverbed Steelhead?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Hello,</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">I was wondering if anyone has worked =
with the Riverbed Steelhead appliance. So far, we have seen =
amazing results in our lab (~5-10 Mbps throughput over a 768K link), but =
It would be nice to hear some real world experiences. I'm also =
wondering if there is flaky behavior once it's deployed.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Thanks,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Kristin</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C49AA9.45296DB0--
