[73854] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter Corlett)
Mon Sep 6 17:07:28 2004
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: abuse@cabal.org.uk (Peter Corlett)
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 21:05:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dopiaza.cabal.org.uk
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net> wrote:
[...]
> No, SPF is not feasible for integration into SpamAssassin. Some links:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/docs/sender-id-position.html
> http://www.debian.org/News/2004/20040904
Microsoft's encumbered Sender ID and SPF are not the same.
> http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/msg03884.html
This URL confirms that Sender ID will not go into Exim, but there is
already SPF support.
--
>> That will happen 2 weeks after pigs fly.
> I hear the government has funded a jet-pig initiative...
Well, thats one way for the politicians to justify more pork in the budget.
- Various in alt.folklore.computers
