|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 23:28:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> To: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0409031131380.11106@darkwing.uoregon.edu> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Lucy E. Lynch wrote: > digging around here will answer some of your load questions: With the background "noise" being approx half a gigabit/s and the PC seeminly having a theoretical limit of 7.5 gigabit/s (according to the article), buffering shouldn't have happened during the test so deep packet buffers wasn't an issue. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |