[73773] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Thu Sep 2 21:00:31 2004
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:31:42 -0400
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net>, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>,
Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@centergate.com>, NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <16695.39086.857158.691282@roam.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:03:26AM +1200, Randy Bush wrote:
> > I don't fundamentally have a problem with any of it. 4 flaps before you
> > start dampening in a time window is a lot of flapping.
>
> you may want to look at
>
> http://rip.psg.com/~randy/030226.apnic-flap.pdf
I've been wondering what the net results would be if one
dampened aggressively but only for a max of 7-15 mins. Might
that allow for the networks to be properly penalized yet provide the
users a minimum amount of time to recover once the prefix is stable?
- jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
