[736] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SECOND CALL FOR AUP MOTION
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perry E. Metzger)
Tue Oct 17 10:08:27 1995
To: Tim Bass <bass@dune.silkroad.com>
cc: com-priv@lists.psi.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Oct 1995 21:44:44 EDT."
<199510170144.VAA01835@dune.silkroad.com>
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 10:02:39 -0400
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Tim Bass writes:
>
> Ladies and Gentlemen:
>
> I think it is fair to say the motion on the table calling for
> a post NSF AUP is not ready to be withdrawn nor tabled and that
> there is sufficient support to call for a group to work together
> to create a rough draft.
What the hell are you talking about? This isn't a deliberative
assembly. We have no "motions". Please quit pretending you are in a
parliament.
Perry
