[7311] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: peering charges?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Danny Stroud)
Wed Jan 29 04:40:31 1997
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 97 15:16:35 UT
From: "Danny Stroud" <dannystroud@msn.com>
To: avg@pluris.com, "Vadim Antonov" <avg@pluris.com>, madison@queber.acsi.net
Cc: davec@ziplink.net, nanog@merit.edu
Don't harangue me about it. Ask Wall Street, look at the numbers for the ISPs,
read the paper regarding the latest AOL flap. This is not my sole opinion. I
will not engage in a philosophical debate on this issue. Sorry, but the
market is the judge. des
----------
From: Vadim Antonov
Sent: Monday, January 27, 1997 2:27 PM
To: avg@pluris.com; Danny Stroud; madison@queber.acsi.net
Cc: davec@ziplink.net; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: peering charges?
Danny Stroud <dannystroud@msn.com> wrote:
>We, the operators,
>have a challenge to make the 'net an economically viable industry. Right now
>it is not, but we seem to be headed in the right direction. des
You may have tons of fun telling that this industry is not economically
viable to (for example) Rick Adams.
--vadim
