[73062] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Testing procedures for new network implementation?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rafi Sadowsky)
Wed Aug 11 11:15:43 2004
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:13:37 +0300 (IDT)
From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog@meron.openu.ac.il>
To: "Ricardo \"Rick\" Gonzalez" <rico.gonzalez@gmail.com>
Cc: Wayne Chow <wayne.chow@utoronto.ca>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3511b4b004081107394d74f47a@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Hi Rick
You seem slightly confused:
All the URLs you sent are for 10/100 ethernet switches/hubs
(I inserted the relevant title below each url )
--
Rafi
## On 2004-08-11 10:39 -0400 Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez typed:
R"G>
R"G> Wayne,
R"G>
R"G> My organization has recently switched from a similar infrastructure to
R"G> the following:
R"G>
R"G> Core: http://www.svec.com/PRODUCTS/fd800ds/FD800DS2.htm
FD800DS 8-port Dual Speed Hub
R"G> Distribution layer: http://www.svec.com/Products/FD521EDS.HTM
FD521 5-port Fast Ethernet Switch
R"G> Wire closet: http://www.svec.com/Products/fd510eds.htm
FD510 5-Port Fast Ethernet Hub
R"G>
R"G> We have seen a noticeable increase in performance, ROI, and
R"G> manageability following the migration away from the prior 3Com
R"G> solution. If you have any implementation-specific questions, please
R"G> mail me off list and I'll do my best to answer them.
R"G>
R"G> With regards,
R"G> ---Rico
R"G>
