[73011] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: XO Mail engineers?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Douglas Otis)
Thu Aug 5 17:06:34 2004
In-Reply-To: <4111802B.1040502@outblaze.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Douglas Otis" <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
To: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <suresh@outblaze.com>
Cc: "David A.Ulevitch" <davidu@everydns.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>
> David A.Ulevitch wrote:
>
>>
>> 1: SRS may just be a boondoggle, we'll see.
>>
>
> Considering MARID seems to be sender id first and the rest nowhere ..
> http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3390221
This article has the state of these drafts stated incorrectly.
See:
http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/msg03062.html
There is a last call coming but there is no assurance Sender-ID will
escape this process. Judging by remaining flaws, I doubt that it will.
CSV will go to last call in October. I think its prospects are better.
There are also work ongoing in MASS such as BATV.
See:
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/04aug/mass.txt
This agenda has been amended to include BATV.
http://www.brandenburg.com/specifications/draft-crocker-marid-batv-00-06dc.html
It will be a draft written by Dave Crocker, John Levine, Sam Silberman,
and Tony Finch. This will stop the bounces and virus notices without any
help from the far end.
I would also expect the Submitter draft in Sender-ID to be dropped.
-Doug
