[7299] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: peering charges?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Edward Henigin)
Mon Jan 27 18:32:18 1997

Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 17:22:32 -0600 (CST)
From: Edward Henigin <ed@texas.net>
To: Dirk Harms-Merbitz <dirk@power.net>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970127102437.8938B-100000@ws6.power.net>


	From what I know, routers (ciscos at least) tend to be
packet-limited rather than bandwidth limited..

	Isn't it a good enough first approximation to count packets
rather than sum packet sizes?


	Ed

--
On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Dirk Harms-Merbitz wrote:

> 
> The packets are of different size. We have been using the phrase "counting
> packets" in the sense of "counting the bytes in packets". 
> 
> Dirk
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post