[7286] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering charges?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jun (John) Wu)
Mon Jan 27 15:01:50 1997
From: Jun (John) Wu <jun@wolfox.gsl.net>
To: young@mci.net (Jeff Young)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 14:50:36 -0500 (EST)
Cc: paul@vix.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199701271908.OAA11437@foghorn.reston.mci.net> from "Jeff Young" at Jan 27, 97 02:08:44 pm
Reply-To: Jun John Wu <jun@wolfox.gsl.net>
===== Jeff Young previously wrote: ====
>
> if internetMCI decides that we should or should not peer with
> another network the decision is made purely on traffic flows.
> if coast to coast traffic moves over our network twice between
> ourselves and the peer, that's not a peer. if the peer has a
> number of nap connections and a ds3 ld packet network, that's a peer.
>
Definitely 100% agree. Now think further, a global network with local
peers all over the place... hmm... how much international bandwidth
that might cost?
> the practice that you refer to as 'unwise' keeps us from losing
> our shirts in an already-too-competitive marketplace.
Underware as well if you think globally.
Jun
--
Jun (John) Wu | Voice: (703)689-5325
Supervisor - Global IP Systems & Services | Fax: (703)478-7852
Global One Communications L.L.C. | Email: jun@gsl.net
Reston, VA 20196 | URL: http://wolfox.gsl.net/jun
