[72855] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ricardo \"Rick\" Gonzalez)
Wed Jul 28 11:12:54 2004
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:12:15 -0400
From: "Ricardo \"Rick\" Gonzalez" <rico.gonzalez@gmail.com>
To: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@cybernothing.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20040726210517.GZ8114@arctic.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
JD,
Nice work. Good to hear Hotmail is doing their fair share to be a
responsible member of the community by adapting SPF. Does this mean
that other improvements, such as not defaulting to sending HTML-tagged
e-mail with a 10-column line wrap, aren't far behind? =)
---Rico
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:05:17 -0700, J.D. Falk <jdfalk@cybernothing.org> wrote:
>
> On 07/26/04, Gerald <gcoon@inch.com> wrote:
>
> > > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/22/HNmicrosoftid_1.html
> >
> > Does it strike anyone else as odd that they would be encouraging the use,
> > but not have SPF setup yet for the primary domains they are known for yet?
>
> From that article: 'Sender ID is a proposed technology standard,
> backed by Microsoft, for verifying an e-mail message's source. It
> combines two previous standards: the Microsoft-developed "Caller
> ID," and the Meng Weng Wong-developed SPF.'
>
> Here's Hotmail's Caller ID record:
>
> _ep.hotmail.com text = "<ep xmlns='http://ms.net/1' testing='true'><out><m><indirect>list1._ep.hotmail.com</indirect><indirect>list2._ep.hotmail.com</indirect><indirect>list3._ep.hotmail.com</indirect></m></out></ep>"
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/twc/privacy/spam_senderid.mspx
>
> --
> J.D. Falk "...one of the worst signs of our danger
> <jdfalk@cybernothing.org> is we can't imagine the route
> from here to utopia."
> -- Kim Stanley Robinson
>
