[72651] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Campus size Wireless LAN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Douglas S. Peeples)
Thu Jul 22 06:59:27 2004
From: "Douglas S. Peeples" <dpeeples@talabs.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 06:58:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20040721180753.G10695@nigel.wjp.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I have used Airya (found easily using google). Fast, cheap, has DES, an
overall good experience.
Cheers,
Doug
Douglas S. Peeples
Technology Assurance Labs
Co-Founder
dpeeples@talabs.com
www.TALabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
William Petrisko
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 9:08 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Campus size Wireless LAN
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 04:03:18PM -0400, Brandon Pinsky wrote:
> I just installed a Quickbridge 60 recently. It's pretty nice. The
> throughput is good over a .75 mile link. I was able to successfully
> push ~20Mbps with an iperf test. Installation was easy relative to
> some of the other equipment we have installed. The feed line is UTP
> and the radio gets power over the UTP cable. The uplink interface is
> 100BaseT which is easy. My only complaint is that it is not remotely
> manageable. You have to have direct console to make any config changes
> which means taking the link down. We have another .11a system in
I believe that this is fixed in the latest release of code...
bill
> production made by RadioLan and it is plagued by the same design flaw.
> Stupid... I'd like to compare it to the Cisco one. I bet it is more
> manageable.
>
> BJ
>
> On Jul 21, 2004, at 2:01 PM, Eric Brown wrote:
>
> >
> > Anyone have experience with Proxim's tsunami quickbridge for wireless
> > connectivity between buildings at line of site distances under 1 mile?
> > It's cheaper than Cisco and looks good on paper. Looking for the good
> > bad and ugly. Thanks in advance!
> >
> > -Eric
>
--
Bill Petrisko
