[72561] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Regional differences in P2P
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Fri Jul 16 21:32:57 2004
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:32:14 -0400
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
To: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Cc: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>,
Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <DD7FE473A8C3C245ADA2A2FE1709D90B0DB2BE@server2003.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 06:15:53PM -0700, Michel Py wrote:
>
> >>> Michel Py wrote:
> >>> BitTorrent is a third of p2p traffic in Sweden? Wow. In
> >>> the US it is a small blip on the radar.
>
> >> Petri Helenius wrote:
> >> Should hold water for Sweden too. Wonder why so many of the
> >> bittorrent streams terminate in the US if it's not on your
> >> radar. Maybe time for finetuning the radar ...
>
> > Jared Mauch wrote:
> > BitTorrent is in my "top ten" tcp ports in my netflow.
>
> Gee I must have something wrong. How does in compare to the
> FastTrack/Kazaa monster on your side?
this is from a 10-15 min sample period, based
on flow count, not bytecount.
TOP TEN:
(tcp)
80, 25, 6699, 4662, 1433
443, 445, 6881, 7171, 6346
(udp)
53, 6257, 27960, 1026, 135
27015, 22321, 1027, 3310, 28960
- jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
