[72556] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Looking for recommendations for Datacenter off CA Faultline
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Li)
Fri Jul 16 19:35:25 2004
In-Reply-To: <40F85C64.4080104@pbp.net>
Cc: Nicole <nmh@daemontech.com>, nanog@nanog.org
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:34:50 -0700
To: jnichols@pbp.net
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
You mean that they're not near any *known* fault lines. Remember
Northridge?
If you're in CA or NV, you *are* near a fault line, no matter where you
are.
http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Maps/122-39.htm
http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/latest.htm
Tony
On Jul 16, 2004, at 3:53 PM, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
>
>
>> Might anyone have any recommendations for datacenters and or ways I
>> can best
>> determine this? It does me no good to go to a datacenter whose
>> connectivity also comes
>> from the same peeing points or fiber that would be effected or take
>> down a
>> data center in South Bay. Despite being off faultline.
>
> www.ragingwire.com
>
> Their data center is not near any fault lines. In fact, it's not near
> much of anything... except Sacramento. :)
>
> Nice place. Fairly new, and they're pleasant folks to deal with.
>
> -Jonathan
>
