|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:00:04 +0300 From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> To: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> Cc: sthaug@nethelp.no, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <DD7FE473A8C3C245ADA2A2FE1709D90B0DB2BB@server2003.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu Michel Py wrote: >Thoughts, anyone? > > If the cap is based on financial requirements, it usually makes sense to set the cap around 90 to 95 percentile mark of your user base. This makes it fairly network dependent. Even on residential-heavy networks the p2p user population is a smallish fraction subscriber-wise but a fairly significant one bandwidth-wise. (to have some numbers I would say >60% and <10%) Pete
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |