[72397] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANN Panel Pans VeriSign Search Service
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Brunner-Williams)
Fri Jul 9 21:17:09 2004
To: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, brunner@nic-naa.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 10 Jul 2004 00:58:47 GMT."
<20040709.175857.20602.287392@webmail19.lax.untd.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:10:16 +0000
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> For anyone who cares:
I'm a mammal who cares. I only just read the findings, it does go on for 85
pages. At the Registrars Constituency meeting held at the Rome ICANN meeting
I spoke unkindly to the smiling-everything-is-fine dream team of Cerf and
Twomey, that they took far too long to issue a cease-and-desist to VGRS for
SiteFinder. That got an EAGAIN (you are wrong, we're fast enough) from Cerf,
and an ENOCLUE from Twomey.
For the original, look to:
http://www.icann.org/committees/security/ssac-report-09jul04.pdf
See also
http://www.icann.org/legal/verisign-v-icann-motion-dismiss-06jul04.pdf
One of VGRS's causes of action was that ICANN shouldn't have interfered
with SiteFinder.
Eric
