[72285] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: concern over public peering points
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher L. Morrow)
Mon Jul 5 19:54:55 2004
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 23:54:18 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
In-reply-to: <20040705110236.GH1101@snowcrash.tpb.net>
To: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Niels Bakker wrote:
>
> The correct phrasing is indeed "one less network" and not "one less
> router." It's rarely one device in my experience.
I'm not sure the number of routers matters much anymore, with more and
more MPLS deployment you can't be sure that the path from A to B goes
directly from A to B, it might go through F, G, H, I before B :( It's
probably more relevant the path RTT isn't it?
