[72142] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: E-Mail Snooping Ruled Permissible
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Henry Linneweh)
Thu Jul 1 01:11:39 2004
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Henry Linneweh <hrlinneweh@sbcglobal.net>
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>,
John Neiberger <John.Neiberger@efirstbank.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20040630190949.1E8441AECF@berkshire.research.att.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Maybe Phil Zimmerman should come forth with new toys
for big boys that will be more valient an effort than
pgp with less a threat to his personal liberty. We
definately need some relief from constantly being
criminalized enmasse for actions from citizens of
other
nations and from control freaks who have for years
slandered us and criminalized us for actions we have
not participated in.
-Henry
--- "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com> wrote:
>
> In message <s0e2b1f2.059@fstest05.fb>, "John
> Neiberger" writes:
> >
> >http://wired.com/news/print/0,1294,64043,00.html
> >
> >Yet another reason why we should develop a system
> where all Internet
> >communications can be easily encrypted, whether
> it's email, VoIP, or
> >whatever. It's not like it's horribly difficult now
> in some cases, but
> >it does have its difficulties when it comes to
> implementation on a large
> >scale.
> >
> Yes -- especially if people rely on wiretap-enabled
> certificates from their
> ISPs....
>
> --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
>
>
>
