[72130] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: (UPDATE) Can a Customer take their IP's with them? (Court says yes!)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W Gilmore)
Wed Jun 30 11:29:11 2004
In-Reply-To: <17f501c45e96$b6a098a0$2a5b8b42@clickdoug.com>
Cc: Patrick W Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net>
From: Patrick W Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:28:02 -0400
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Jun 30, 2004, at 7:38 AM, Doug White wrote:
> As more and more of the "facts" come to light, it appears that NAC has
> brought
> much of this on themselves, and will need to dedicate the legal
> resources to
> counter the claims of Pegasus, in fact their own survival may well
> depend on
> it. I have to admit I have little sympathy for them or any provider
> who hosts
> spam operations.
I also have little sympathy for a provider who hosts spammers, but I
know the NAC people and they ain't spammer or spam friendly.
Secondly, why would NAC have to do ANYTHING to survive. They can just
go "okay", let the space slip out of their hands, ignore any complaints
/ whatever that come through on it, and go their merry way.
The TRO of and by itself is ... troublesome, but not a threat to the
Internet. If this becomes common practice, we are all in trouble.
Guess we will all just have to wait and see.
--
TTFN,
patrick
