[71962] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul G)
Sat Jun 26 23:08:47 2004
From: "Paul G" <paul@rusko.us>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 23:04:41 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne E. Bouchard" <web@typo.org>
To: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg@netzero.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses.
>
> I can tell you that at least with my customers, the term "class C" is
> only used to clarify what is meant by "slash 24" and always with the
> phrase "is the equivilant to"
>
> And a bit surprisingly, I'm having to explain this less and less. Even
> the sales team is learning to speak CIDR.
>
> So there is indeed hope.
agreed. although, some customers are still dumb-founded when i tell them
noone can give them a class C and offer a /24 instead =]
paul
