[71958] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Howard C. Berkowitz)
Sat Jun 26 22:19:20 2004
In-Reply-To: <20040627020348.GQ41985@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:18:23 -0400
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@gettcomm.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 10:03 PM -0400 6/26/04, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
>This is what happens when your educational system continues to teach
>classful routing as anything other than a HISTORICAL FOOTNOTE
>*coughCiscocough*. This is also how you end up with 76k /24s in the global
>routing table.
>
>Do you part to help control the ignorant population: whenever you hear
>someone say "class [ABC]" in reference to anything other than a historical
>allocation, smack them. Hard.
May I take this opportunity to remind people of my Atlanta 1998
(IIRC) NANOG tutorial on ISP addressing, "Good Providers have No
Class"?
