[71793] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Unplugging spamming PCs

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Pingree)
Wed Jun 23 18:04:02 2004

Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:59:59 -0700
From: "Larry Pingree" <lpingree@juniper.net>
To: "Petri Helenius" <pete@he.iki.fi>,
	"Sam Hayes Merritt, III" <sam@themerritts.org>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Mail servers should be registered just like domains and shutdown by a
registrar if they are misusing their registered services. This really
needs to be handled by a multi-lateral legal solution, industry will not
fix it alone.

LP
=20
Best Regards,
=20
Larry
=20
Larry Pingree
Partner Engineering
Juniper Networks, Inc.
408-543-2190
=20
"Visionary people, are visionary, partly because of the great many
things they never get to see." - Larry Pingree
Juniper Networks Logo

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Petri Helenius
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 1:15 PM
To: Sam Hayes Merritt, III
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Unplugging spamming PCs


Sam Hayes Merritt, III wrote:

>
>Proactive would be blocking port 25 except to comcast.net's mail
servers,
>at least on retail users without static IPs, and then opening it up if
>the customer cannot work around it by using comcast's mail server to
send
>out. Thats what responsible ISPs have done.
> =20
>
No, that would be punishing before the crime happened. Responsible would

be to punish swiftly after the fact, but not before.

Pete


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post