[71759] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Packeteer
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hepworth)
Wed Jun 23 03:52:29 2004
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:51:44 +0100
From: Martin Hepworth <martinh@solid-state-logic.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <062220042051.12903.40D89BD9000388ED0000326722007348400A99019D0C999D@comcast.net>
X-MailScanner-From: martinh@solid-state-logic.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Rob
Used here, packshaper that is. Very effective, easy to use - had it up
and running in a couple of hours and saved my life when we had a 128k
line - ie was cheaper at the time to buy one of these than to upgrade
the line.
Nowadays it's kinda redundant as I've got an E1 so I don't get bandwidth
hogging issues. I keep it to make sure the VPN etc gets it QoS.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
rwcrowe@comcast.net wrote:
> Anyone had any good/bad experiences with the PacketSeeker or PacketShaper product ? (http://www.packeteer.com/). It looks like a good sub-$10,000 traffic monitor that will allow you to see all Layers of traffic utilization and reporting. Plus you can upgrade it to shape traffic with a license and firmware upgrade.
>
> Rob
>
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.
**********************************************************************
