|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 03:23:06 +0000 (GMT) From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com> In-reply-to: <20040619224246.X42597@shell.inch.com> To: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com> Cc: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh@outblaze.com>, Jonathan Slivko <jslivko@gmail.com>, nanog@merit.edu Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Charles Sprickman wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Jonathan Slivko wrote: > > > > > Maybe if NANOG had irc.nanog.org, maybe that might be something to > > > consider - a real-time network of communication for network operators > > > to deal with issues, etc. > > > > There's always http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-security > > I can tell you right off AS8059 doesn't meet the requirements. I'd gladly > respond to any reports of attacks from them, but I don't think you'd ever > see any. which of your 2 upstreams isn't helping out? I'm fairly certain both providers have security groups, and do mitigate attacks for customers on a regular basis. Perhaps you are not getting in touch with the correct customer service folks? We often have this issue ;( > > Basement multihomers unite. > hurray!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |