[71619] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Fwd: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Lesher)
Sat Jun 19 12:41:55 2004
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu (nanog list)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 12:49:17 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <20040619162021.EC1CD1AE86@berkshire.research.att.com> from "Steven M. Bellovin" at Jun 19, 2004 12:20:20 PM
Reply-To: wb8foz@nrk.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
>
>
> Any provider of wire or electronic communication service,
> landlord, custodian or other person furnishing such facilities
> or technical assistance shall be compensated therefor by the
> applicant for reasonable expenses incurred in providing such
> facilities or assistance.
>
>
> --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
The issue, I suspect, is, who defines "reasonable" here? Is it
like Blue Cross who decides that "UCR" is 50% of what every MD
charges, and refuses to justify their decision?
I suspect some here have already "been there, done that"...
Then there is the issue of getting paid in a timely manner,
Prompt Payment Act or not.
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
