[71610] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School )
Fri Jun 18 21:08:57 2004
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:10:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
To: "Jon R. Kibler" <Jon.Kibler@aset.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <40D30F9E.256311EC@aset.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
see http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/18/0334236&mode=nested
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Jon R. Kibler wrote:
>
> OK, I have obviously missed something here... I know that the courts
> dismissed the original complaint against ICANN, but what has happened
> since, and what is this about some conspiracy? Are they trying to say
> that users of the anti-SiteFinder BIND patch are conspirators?
>
--
http://www.icannwatch.org Personal Blog: http://www.discourse.net
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's warm here.<--
