[71590] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Jun 18 16:41:07 2004
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:40:27 -0700
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <g37ju4bwy3.fsf@sa.vix.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==========348E14DB2379D2062721==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
--On Friday, June 18, 2004 17:25 +0000 Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com> wrote:
>
>> PV> if it's not that, then perhaps they're just smoking crack.
>>
>> Still a bit of a stretch. They receive money for registered domains =
(and
>> attempted to for unregistered domains) in the .COM and .NET namespaces.
>
> my employer was a bidder for .ORG, and gives away EPP software ("ISC
> OpenReg"), so there's some overlap with the registry/registrar community
> that verisign might be thinking of.
Didn't Verisign sell off the Registrar stuff, thus making OpenReg not
a competitor?
Owen
--=20
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.
--==========348E14DB2379D2062721==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFA01M/n5zKWQ/iqj0RAstGAJwKbhSMsBPo8PT/XtgsgQmkUI3W2ACeIg3z
+v2Fhn2669Bht0pdE1WLOTY=
=wp+f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========348E14DB2379D2062721==========--
