[71568] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven M. Bellovin)
Fri Jun 18 12:22:05 2004
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
To: "Jon R. Kibler" <Jon.Kibler@aset.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:51:58 EDT."
<40D30F9E.256311EC@aset.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:16:34 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
In message <40D30F9E.256311EC@aset.com>, "Jon R. Kibler" writes:
>
>
>OK, I have obviously missed something here... I know that the courts dismissed
> the original complaint against ICANN, but what has happened since, and what i
>s this about some conspiracy? Are they trying to say that users of the anti-Si
>teFinder BIND patch are conspirators?
No -- but the easiest thing to do is to read the amended complaint,
which is linked-to from ICANN's home page.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
