[71562] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Pushing GTLD zones [WAS: Akamai DNS Issue?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Perez)
Fri Jun 18 08:25:32 2004
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:21:06 -0400
From: "Joel Perez" <jperez@uspgi.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
He, He! :)
-------------------------------------
Joel Perez | Network Engineer
jperez@uspgi.com | www.USPGI.com
-------------------------------------
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Paul Vixie
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 2:00 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Pushing GTLD zones [WAS: Akamai DNS Issue?]
> > think stability.
>=20
> I think recent events prove pretty well that Verisign GRS no longer=20
> gives a crap about stability. Have we forgotten *.COM so quickly?
oh please. i was an publically critical of *.COM and *.NET, but that's
a policy problem, not an operational problem. verisign has a very good
record for name server uptime, both at the TLD and root level. if
you're going to complain about their wildcard policies, please be
specific.
(note that verisign has amended their complaint against icann (since the
court dismissed the first one) and i'm now named as a co-conspirator.
if you reply to this message, there's a good chance of your e-mail
appearing in court filings at some point.)
--=20
Paul Vixie
