[71555] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (william(at)elan.net)
Thu Jun 17 21:35:22 2004
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20040618012051.0D22513951@sa.vix.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > Anything I/we can do to help the cause?
>
> not at the moment. i'm not a defendant, just a named co-conspirator.
Hah? Are they also naming individually all the dns operators that installed
bind patch and specifically enabled it so that wildcards would not work?
For that matter why don't they just name entire NANOG! I remember what a
reaction there was on the list and 100% of those responding were purely
negative of Verisign wildcards.
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william@elan.net
