[71545] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Shultz)
Thu Jun 17 18:26:07 2004
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:10:57 -0700
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: "Jeff Shultz" <jeffshultz@wvi.com>
Reply-To: "Jeff Shultz" <jeffshultz@wvi.com>
In-Reply-To: <40D2130C.4070609@buckhorn.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I'm having fun figuring out how altering BIND (since I assume that is
the basis of their arguements) rises to the level of conspiracy...
IANAL, obviously.
** Reply to message from Bob Martin <bob@buckhorn.net> on Thu, 17 Jun
2004 16:54:20 -0500
> Anything I/we can do to help the cause?
>
> Bob Martin
>
> Quoted from different thread:
>
>
> >(note that verisign has amended their complaint against icann (since the
> >court dismissed the first one) and i'm now named as a co-conspirator. if
> >you reply to this message, there's a good chance of your e-mail appearing
> >in court filings at some point.)
> > -- Paul Vixie
--
Jeff Shultz
A railfan pulls up to a RR crossing hoping that
there will be a train.
